SYSTEM_STATUS // ONLINE
00:00:00 UTC ISO 9001 / AS9100 COMPLIANT
SYSTEM ACTIVE // VER: 2026.08 // ABU DHABI, UAE

ENGINEERING MATERIALS WITH CODE, SIMULATION & DATA.

>

I'm Dr. Shahadat Hussain — an Associate Research Scientist treating computation as a first-class laboratory instrument. I design algorithms that generate metamaterial geometries, simulate their mechanical response, and learn from manufacturing telemetry to make additive manufacturing predictable and defect-free.

CONSOLE_MONITOR

PROCESS TELEMETRY LPBF-NITI-01

LASER POWER (P) 225 W
SCAN SPEED (v) 950 mm/s
ENERGY DENSITY (VED) 59.2 J/mm³
DEFECT PROBABILITY 0.03% (LOW)
MAT: NiTi Shape Memory Alloy
// 01. ABOUT

The lab bench is a terminal.

Modern materials engineering lives at the intersection of geometry, physics, and data. My computational work spans the full loop: generating triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) fields, discretizing them into printable meshes, simulating their mechanical response, and closing the loop with machine-learning models trained on real laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process data.

This approach lets me do things that are impractical experimentally — sweep hundreds of lattice parameters overnight, predict where balling or spattering will occur before a single laser fires, and quantify microstructural features directly from SEM imagery instead of eyeballing them.

"For industry partners in aerospace and defense, this translates to three things: faster iteration, lighter parts, and qualified processes."
PhD - AcSIR / CSIR Postdoc - Khalifa Univ NYU Abu Dhabi IBM Data Science Cert
Dr. Shahadat Hussain
QUALIFIED

DR. SHAHADAT HUSSAIN

ASSOCIATE RESEARCH SCIENTIST

Additive Manufacturing & Metamaterials

6+ YEARS_R&D_EXP
3+ TPMS_TOPOLOGIES
10+ PUBLICATIONS
∞ PARAM_SWEEPS
// 02. LIVE TPMS GEOMETRY & TELEMETRY SIMULATOR
2D_ISOFIELD_PREVIEW
FIELD: GYROID ISO-LEVEL CELLS: 128 x 128

TPMS LATTICE PARAMETER CONTROL

Adjust parameters in real-time to simulate relative density and iso-surface threshold offsets for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF).

ISO THRESHOLD (t) 0.35
CELL FREQUENCY (ω) 2.5
EST. RELATIVE DENSITY 28.4 %
POROSITY 71.6 %
PRINTABILITY OPTIMAL
// 03. TECH_STACK

Tools of the trade

A scientific-computing stack purpose-built for computational materials design and manufacturing analytics.

LANGUAGE / CORE
  • ▸Python (NumPy, SciPy, pandas)
  • ▸MATLAB / Numerical Methods
  • ▸C++ for Performance Kernels
  • ▸Bash & Linux HPC Workflows
ML / INFORMATICS
  • ▸scikit-learn · Defect Classify
  • ▸PyTorch · Surrogate Models
  • ▸OpenCV · SEM Quantification
  • ▸Materials Pipelines & EDA
GEOMETRY / FEA
  • ▸Implicit Surfaces & Marching Cubes
  • ▸nTopology Lattice Design
  • ▸FEA Scripting (Abaqus/ANSYS)
  • ▸STL / 3MF Mesh Processing
ENGINEERING / OPS
  • ▸Git, Actions, Reproducibility
  • ▸LaTeX & Scientific Reporting
  • ▸LPBF Telemetry Analysis
  • ▸Data-Driven AM Parameters
// 04. CODE_SHOWCASE

From equation to print file

The heart of the lattice generator — a gyroid is just three lines of trigonometry until you discretize it, threshold it, and hand it to a printer.

tpms_generator.py — computational-materials
PYTHON 3.10 // NUMPY
import numpy as np

def gyroid(x, y, z):
    """Implicit gyroid surface — F(x, y, z) = t."""
    return (np.sin(x) * np.cos(y)
          + np.sin(y) * np.cos(z)
          + np.sin(z) * np.cos(x))

def sample_field(level_fn, n=160, threshold=0.35):
    """Sample the level-set field on a regular grid.
    The resulting scalar field feeds marching-cubes
    to produce a watertight, LPBF-ready mesh.
    """
    grid = np.linspace(0, 2 * np.pi, n)
    x, y, z = np.meshgrid(grid, grid, grid)
    return (level_fn(x, y, z) - threshold).astype(np.float32)

# One unit cell, ready for laser powder bed fusion
field = sample_field(gyroid, n=160, threshold=0.35)
print(f"field sampled: {field.shape} · ready for meshing")
// 05. RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS

Published work, backed by pipelines

Every study below is supported by reproducible analysis code — from raw process logs to final figures.

YEAR: 2026 // LATEST PUBLICATION PEER-REVIEWED

Do chopped fibers matter? Process–structure–property relationships and thermal annealing effects in fiber-reinforced TPMS lattices

Investigated the effect of carbon fiber reinforced composite and annealing on mechanical properties of TPMS gyroid cubes.

Progress in Additive Manufacturing · Vol. xxx · pp. xxx–xxx
YEAR: 2023 JOURNAL ARTICLE

Microstructural and surface analysis of NiTi TPMS lattice sections fabricated by laser powder bed fusion

Built the image-analysis and statistical pipeline used to quantify Ni evaporation, oxide- and Ti-rich phase formation across Primitive and Gyroid topologies — linking geometry and laser parameters to solid-phase distribution.

Journal of Manufacturing Processes · Vol. 102 · pp. 375–386
YEAR: 2022 JOURNAL ARTICLE

Imperfections formation in thin layers of NiTi TPMS lattices fabricated using LPBF

Designed the experimental-parameter sweep and defect-classification workflow that isolated the effects of relative density and scan strategy on balling and intergranular cracking in thin Schwarz TPMS layers.

Materials · 15(22), 7950
YEAR: 2022 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS

Inhomogeneous microstructure due to non-uniform solidification rate in NiTi TPMS structures

Developed the SEM feature-mapping workflow used to document ten distinct microstructural regimes across lattice struts, providing the quantitative basis for solidification-rate hypotheses in architected AM parts.

ASME IMECE · Columbus, Ohio, USA
// CONTACT_INTERFACE

Let's build something precise.

Open to R&D and advanced-manufacturing roles in aerospace, defense, and high-performance engineering — especially where computation meets the melt pool.